PartAVocabularyandReading
Readthepassagebelowandthencompletethetasksthatfollow:
LanguageandCulturalIdentity
C。Kramsch
para。1Itiswidelybelievedthatthereisanaturalconnectionbetweenthelanguagespokenbymembersofasocialgroupandthatgroup‘sidentity。Bytheiraccent,theirvocabulary,theirdiscoursepatterns,speakersidentifythemselvesandareidentifiedasmembersofthisorthatspeechanddiscoursecommunity。Fromthismembership,theydrawpersonalstrengthandpride,aswellasasenseofsocialimportanceandhistoricalcontinuityfromusingthesamelanguageasthegrouptheybelongto。
para。2Buthowtodefinewhichgrouponebelongsto?Inisolated,homogeneouscommunitiesliketheTrobriandersstudiedbyMalinowski,onemaystilldefinegroupmembershipaccordingtocommonculturalpracticesanddailyface-to-faceinteractions,butinmodem,historicallycomplex,opensocietiesitismuchmoredifficulttodefinetheboundariesofanyparticularsocialgroupandthelinguisticandculturalidentitiesofitsmembers。
para。3Takeethnicityforexample。Intheir1982surveyconductedamongthehighlymixedpopulationofBelize,LePageandTabouret-Kellerfoundoutthatdifferentpeopleascribedthemselvestodifferentethnicitiesaseither‘Spanish‘,‘Creole‘,‘Maya‘or‘Belizean‘,accordingtowhichethniccriteriontheyfocusedon—physicalfeatures,generalappearance,geneticdescent,provenance,ornationality。Rarelywaslanguageusedasanethnicallydefiningcriterion。Interestingly,itwasonlyunderthethreatofaGuatemalantakeoverassoonasBritishrulewouldcease,thatthesenseofaBelizeannationalidentityslowlystartedemergingfromamongthemultipleethnicascriptionsthatpeoplestillgivethemselvestothisday。
para。4Groupidentitybasedonracewouldseemeasiertodefine,andyettherearealmostasmanygeneticdifferences,say,betweenmembersofthesameWhite,orBlackraceastherearebetweentheclassicallydescribedhumanraces,nottospeakofthedifficultyinsomecasesofascertainingwith100percentexactitudeaperson‘sraciallineage。Forexample,in1983theSouthAfricanGovernmentchangedtheracialclassificationof690people:two-thirdsofthese,whohadbeenColoreds,becameWhites,71whohadbeenBlacksbecameColoreds,and11Whiteswereredistributedamongotherracialgroups!And,ofcourse,thereisnonecessarycorrelationbetweenagivenracialcharacteristicandtheuseofagivenlanguageorvarietyoflanguage
para。5Regionalidentityisequallycontestable。AsreportedintheLondonTimesofFebruary1984,whenaSovietbook,PopulationsoftheWorld,claimedthatthepopulationofFranceconsistedof‘French,Alsatians,Flemings,Bretons,Basques,Catalans,Corsicans,Jews,Armenians,Gypsiesand“others‘“,GeorgesMarchais,theFrenchCommunistleader,violentlydisagreed:‘Forus‘,hesaid,‘everymanandwomanofFrenchnationalityisFrench。Franceisnotamultinationalstate:itisonenation,theproductofalonghistory。。。。‘
para。6Onewouldthinkthatnationalidentityisaclear-cuteither/oraffair,butitisonething,forexample,tohaveaTurkishpassport,anotherthingtoascribetoyourselfaTurkishnationalidentityifyouwereborn,raisedandeducated,say,inGermany,arenativespeakerofGerman,andhappentohaveTurkishparents。